The lawsuit, according to documents seen by The Washington Post, claim that "malevolent or, at the very least, extraordinarily reckless" decisions were made to the set without Balenciaga's knowledge or approval as the company is seeking nearly $25 million in damages due to the now publicly perceived association between the company and the "repulsive and deeply disturbing subject of the court decision."ĭeJardin's team told Washington Post that "Everyone from Balenciaga was on the shoot and was present on every shot and worked on the edit of every image in post-production," in response to news of the lawsuit. The controversial case ruled that the "pandering" of child pornography did not violate the First Amendment even if the person charged with such an offense did already possess said pornography to trade.īalenciaga is now suing North Six (the company that produced the photoshoot) as well as the set designer, Nicholas Des Jardins. tsMOuWhMra- A November 26, 2022In one photo, court documentation can be seen on the desk where the Balenciaga bag is placed from the 2008 case titled United States vs. Also are we just not talking abt how the hourglass bag ad was an Balenciaga collab? You know the one with the Supreme Court document referring to child pornography?Įveryone should be held accountable.
0 kommentar(er)
